
Highlights: Origins of the family surname; an article pertaining to William Buswell; 1st. mention of
BUZZELLs in America?; Maine vital records to 1899; and more...
FROM De BOSSVILE -TO -BUSWELL:
ORIGINS OF A SURNAME
Some family names are patronymics, such as: Johnson; John, son of John becomes John JOHNSON, etc., while others are names of crafts/ trades, such as Carpenter and Baker, etc.. Yet others are derived from place names, such as Melville, Kent, and Bosville/Boseville. this is where the name BOSWELL belongs. The story takes us all the way back to the 6th century A.D., at a time when France was still part of the Roman Empire, and the countryside was full of tracts of land commonly known as 'manors' (Latin for 'villae') such as Marcovilla, Claudiovilla, Juliovilla, and Marcovilla, each bearing the name of the Lord of the Manor. When the Franks invaded, their chiefs took the places of the Gallo-Roman feudal lords. Right in the heart of what is now known as Normandy was a village called Boson, named after one of the Frank's leading citizens in the area. One such manor/villa took it's name from this village, Bosonvilla, which in fact covered an area spanning several square miles. Five hundred years later (just prior to the Battle Of Hastings) the Lord of that manor/villa was a Danish-Norman nobleman named Sieur Martin, whose son Sieur Robert (and his three sons: Anthon(e)y, Richard, and William were among those who faught with William The Conquerer at Hastings. The victors were then awarded tracts of land in Southern England.
Although the exact time is unknown, it is most commonly believed that shortly after the invasion was when Sieur Martin took BOSVIL/ BOSVILLE/ BOSEVILLE as his adopted surname, a variation of BOSONVILLA. It is believed that they were all taking up residency in Southern England at this time. Soon after the surname was noted in various records of his son and grand children, which also included a fourth, Clarembald (whose occupation was listed as: MONK), who apparently did not participate at Hastings. It is generally accepted that these were the first of the surname to settle in England.
Over time the family name became anglicized, as so many were, and there is also evidence that the spelling was in fact changed in some cases, from generation to generation, for various reasons. Today there are multiple variations of the surname throughout England, Scotland, Austrailia, Canada, and the U.S., however, yet the names Boseville, Bosville, Bosvil, and even Beuzeville still survives in many places to this day.
NOTE: Today there are two communities in central Normandy (within a few miles of each other) possibly sharing the same origins: Bosville and Beuzeville. FROM MARTIN (1) de BOSEVILLE (de BOSVILLE, de BOSVILE) TO ISSAC (20) BUSWELL (BOSWELL, BUZZELL), WHO IS GENERALLY BELIEVED TO BE THE IMMIGRANT ANCESTOR TO THOSE SURNAMES IN AMERICA. See how the surname has changed over the years. MARTIN (1) was living in a section of NORMANDY (France) called Bosen before the Battle of Hastings in 1066. There is no records to indicate he was using a last name until AFTER the battle. Martin was living at the BOSENVILLA in Normandy. "Villa" is French for "Manor"; about that time Martin was legally known as Martin de BOSEVILLE. With time, "de Boseville" (de Boseville) was adopted as the family surname (after the Battle of Hastings in 1066).
An article pertaining to WILLIAM BUSWELL of Marblehead
In July, 1677, ROBERT ROULES, of Marblehead, Massachusetts (about 30 years of age), was a seasoned mariner while onboard the Catch, “William and Sarah” of Salem, Mass. Roules reported that while Joseph Boovey, “Master” of a another fishing vessel for hire was riding anchor along with several other boats, near the port of Latour on the easterly side of Cape Sable, which forms the eastern limits to the Gulf of Maine, opposite Cape Cod. It was a Saturday, Boovey was about halfway through his day when suddenly he spotted about nine or ten Sagamore Indians in canoes with, according to Roules, “their Armesreddy fixt loaded & cockt!” Luckily, no one was hit, as the colonists proclaimed, “Why you kill Englishmen?” One of the savages replied, “If Englishmen shoot, we kill!” to which the Indians then proceeded to grab five Englishmen, no less, including Boovey, and
tying them up as if out of sheer greed or sport! One after another the savages proceeded to strip the stunned Englishmen of not just their dignity, but also their clothes as well, allowing them to remain on deck in their underwear, socks, and shoes. They also let Boovey wear a greasy shirt. There were 26 men and boys, of which they held captive through until around two PM the following day. After the savages inform each of their captives they were planning to kill all but three. they were all ordered to sail to Penobscutt, the Indians having taken command of each fishing vessel. Mr. Roules told authorities that, upon witnessing these events from a distance, apparently far enough away so as not to be spotted by the savages, he then came upon a fishing vessel out of Boston, skippered by a certain Mr. Watts, who apparently urged. Roules to take chase of the savages. Said Watts, “...wee having to prevent murder advise the Indians to lye close, though cockt & the English would deliver accordingly!” Mr. Roules was understandably anxious. Roules and Watts, aboard their respective vessels, began their clandestine pursuit, until dusk, and too dark and dangerous. Mr. Roules also mentioned that as it grew much too dark to continue, he heard one of the Sagamore’s command the Englishmen on one unnamed vessel, to “bear up on the helm!” of which the impudent helmsman refused. The Sagamores grew increasing angry, no doubt intending certain retribution. But before the savage had a chance to retaliate, one of the hostages, crewman WILLIAM BUSWELL, of Marblehead, took it upon himself to grab the savage by the throat, tripping him up be the heels, and kept him down with a knee. That’s when another hostage by the name of Richard Downing began to tangle with
another Indian, got the savage down, intending to throw him overboard. According to BUSWELL, the Indian’s leg got entangled in something, of which he then managed to free and them proceeded to take his leg, and assisted in throwing him into the water. The Indians tried to settle the unruly Englishman down, but, to no avail, another savage was tossed into the cold Atlantic. Then they took and bound the two savages adamant on restraining the unruly Englishmen, who, now back in command of the vessel, turn sail and headed away southeast as fast as they could, eventually finding safety in Marblehead Harbor, just before sundown. In all, the entire episode, apparently, lasting all of eight days, to which time rampant rumors suggesting their apparent demise were apparently erroneous. The good townspeople, though shocked and perhaps a bit bewildered to say the least, came down to greet the freed hostages on the shore. Though glad they were finally safe and well, they were surprised the crew allowed the savages to live. Explaining that they had lost their clothes, save for their undergarments and such, having barely escaping with their own lives by the grace of God, happy to having their own lives spared, hoping the entire incident would soon be forgotten, though the townspeople, angry as they were, did not wholly concur. They helped the freed men and boys, some still bound by their hands, wearing only their underclothes, socks, and shoes, come ashore, making certain they first saw the constable, before appearing in court in Boston to testify. The good citizens of Marblehead did not take too kindly to what these Sagamore Indians had done, especially the women who had designs on shooting them all dead for what they had done. Some women proclaiming they would “take to throing stones at them." The women wanted to take matters into their own hands, if they had any say in the matter; no doubt with designs on scalping the lot of them, despite what the men thought. Nor would they rest until all the savages were dead, promising that, “if there had bin forty of the best Indians in the Country, they would kill them all!" Though they were hanged for their crimes, neither Marblehead constable, Mr. Mavericke, "nor any (other) suffered to come near them."
SOURCES: Massachusetts State Archives, Vol. 69 #158
Peabody Essex Institute Historical Collection, Vol. LIV, April, 1918

FIRST MENTION OF BUZZELLs IN AMERICA?
Some say that there may have been two BUSWELL/BUZZELL immigrant ancestors (first of the surname (to America. One landed at Salem and settled in Salisbury, Essex, Mass. in 1639/ '40 Issac (Isaac), sometimes referred to as Isachar, BUSWELL b. 1593; the other, some say, landed & settled in Southern New Hampshire.
At some point, possibly the mid-1700s, the name went from BUSWELL to BUZZELL. Isaac, (the fifth Isaac in successive generations) BUSWELL, was born April 27, 1719, married Hannah ELDRIDGE. In October of 1728, in Wells, Maine. They had ten children, and the records for each child state that their last name was now BUZZELL. Does that mean their parents had intended to change the spelling of their surname, thus adopting it as well? Or did the kids concoct the whole thing, and if so, why? Could it also be that records of the children were simply misspelled? And if that is the case, then why would generations to follow also adopt the new spelling? There are several different spellings of this family, which also include: BUSSELL, BUZWELL, and so on; not to mention the earliest spellings on record: BOSEVILLE; BOSVILLE; BOSVILE; BOSVIL, and so on.
Below is possibly the record of the very first BUZZELL line here in America. Beginning with Roger (the father of the very first of this line to migrate to America--in 1639/'40), 20 generations after Martin de BOSEVILLE (BOSVILLE, BOSSVILLE, etc.), who is said to be the very first in this family to use a last name.
ROGER BOSWELL (BUSWELL)
Roger was baptized as an adult in 1586. He was the son of John BOSWELL (BUSWELL) (b. about 1515 in Dixey (Dixley, Dishley) Grange, Leicestershire, England, and Elizabeth Hall (b. abt. 1520) in Husband's Bosworth, Leicester, England.); the baptisms of all their children were recorded, as well as the surviving children in their wills. Roger BOSWELL (BUSWELL) was buried June 14, 1609 at Husband's Bosworth Parish. His will was dated November 21, 1606, and was proved July 6, 1609.
THE FOLLOWING FAMILY MEMBERS WERE MENTIONED IN HIS WILL:
1. His wife, Margaret.
2. Eldest son, Elias.
3. 2nd. son, Ermus.
4. 3rd. son, William.
5. 4th son, Thomas.
6. 5th son, Issac (Isaac, Isachar)
7. Oldest daughter, Agnys.
8. 2nd. daughter, Susan.
9. 3rd. daughter, Rebecca.
10. Youngest daughter, Joane.
The will of Margaret (Margarite) was dated February 13, 1610 and was probated March 27, 1613. At this time the children she has listed are:
1. Thomas
2. Issac
3. Susan
4. Rebecca
NOTE: DIXEY, (DIXLEY, DISHLEY) GRANGE was a part of the Garendon Abbey in Husband's Bosworth. Kind of a farming co-op where all the families lived together as one big community; free housing in exchange for their participation within the grange.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE REST OF '1st. BUZZELLs IN AMERICA?'

and by the way...
IF YOU NEED PEDIGREE CHARTS OR INDIVIDUAL & FAMILY GROUP WORKSHEETS
TO HELP KEEP YOUR RESEARCH IN ORDER